The trouble is, the types of data typically used for training language models may be used up in the near future—as early as 2026, according to a paper by researchers from Epoch, an AI research and forecasting organization. The issue stems from the fact that, as researchers build more powerful models with greater capabilities, they have to find ever more texts to train them on. Large language model researchers are increasingly concerned that they are going to run out of this sort of data, says Teven Le Scao, a researcher at AI company Hugging Face, who was not involved in Epoch’s work.
The issue stems partly from the fact that language AI researchers filter the data they use to train models into two categories: high quality and low quality. The line between the two categories can be fuzzy, says Pablo Villalobos, a staff researcher at Epoch and the lead author of the paper, but text from the former is viewed as better-written and is often produced by professional writers.
Data from low-quality categories consists of texts like social media posts or comments on websites like 4chan, and greatly outnumbers data considered to be high quality. Researchers typically only train models using data that falls into the high-quality category because that is the type of language they want the models to reproduce. This approach has resulted in some impressive results for large language models such as GPT-3.
One way to overcome these data constraints would be to reassess what’s defined as “low” and “high” quality, according to Swabha Swayamdipta, a University of Southern California machine learning professor who specializes in dataset quality. If data shortages push AI researchers to incorporate more diverse datasets into the training process, it would be a “net positive” for language models, Swayamdipta says.
Researchers may also find ways to extend the life of data used for training language models. Currently, large language models are trained on the same data just once, due to performance and cost constraints. But it may be possible to train a model several times using the same data, says Swayamdipta.
Some researchers believe big may not equal better when it comes to language models anyway. Percy Liang, a computer science professor at Stanford University, says there’s evidence that making models more efficient may improve their ability, rather than just increase their size.
“We’ve seen how smaller models that are trained on higher-quality data can outperform larger models trained on lower-quality data,” he explains.